This post reveals my perspective on the issue of De La Salle University's Commission on Elections being taken for granted as an institution by the Legislative Assembly (LA). As Chairman Emeritus of this institution, I believe that not only has the LA jeopardized the current commissioners, but moreover, the institution itself.
Insulted
J. Charles Lacson, Chairman Emeritus, COMELEC
The issue has come to a point where the current commissioners of COMELEC and even I, as Chairman Emeritus, have lost confidence in the credibility and competence of the Legislative Assembly itself. COMELEC has been denied of time essential for team building and for the fundamental action of organizing itself as an institution. Furthermore, COMELEC has been placed in jeopardy because of the constant procrastination and filibusterism of the Legislative Assembly. Basically, with the current provisions, we see it almost impossible and extremely difficult to efficiently organize the General Elections.
The mere incidence of the rescission of Andre de Leon’s appointment as COMELEC commissioner for College of Business and Economics without a hearing, without justifiable evidence, and without giving a chance for Mr. de Leon to defend himself has made the Legislative Assembly’s intentions questionable. I am insulted that the LA was ignorant to my claims as Chairman Emeritus, and they were rather swayed by the testimony of a political party president - considering baseless hearsay over my evaluation as Mr. de Leon’s co-worker and superior.
Furthermore, though the LA has revised the COMELEC Code in response to my proposals, it has made more loopholes instead of stitching them. One such loophole is the subjective basis for voter’s harassment, which, as stated in the code, is “any unwelcome and/or unwanted acts made directly to solicit votes, pledges or support for/or against a candidate or political party that humiliates/ridicules/offends a person” (Art. III, Sect. 22). Anyone can feign humiliation, ridicule or anger. Such a subjective basis can be vulnerable to abuse.
I am again insulted that the Legislative Assembly has made these revisions without any consultation with COMELEC or with me as the proponent. Thus, some revisions have been made out of misinterpretation, such as the new requirement for commissioners to have “at [least] served as a COMELEC Commissioner or Volunteer for at least one term” (Art. IV, Sect 7.2.1). The COMELEC Board does not necessarily prefer volunteers over those with no experience since the job of a volunteer is very different from that of a commissioner.
With these circumstances in mind, The COMELEC has every right to doubt the impartiality of the Legislative Assembly in terms of appointing COMELEC Commissioners, and every right to complain that the way the Legislative Assembly has been handling the appointment of commissioners and the revision of the COMELEC Code has been inefficient and thus devastating the integrity and efficiency of COMELEC as an institution.
Just, free, and honest elections for De La Salle University – Manila and the efficiency and productivity of COMELEC as the institution that organizes and maintains the sanctity of these elections are now standing on the edge of a knife.
Labels: De La Salle University Manila DLSU COMELEC Commission on Elections Legislative Assembly Chairman Emeritus LA